As remote work continues to shape the post-pandemic economy, Montana ranks near the bottom nationally for work-from-home conditions, according to a new analysis from our friends over at WalletHub.

About 12% of full-time employees work entirely from home, while another 27% do hybred word between multiple locations. But the effectiveness of those arrangements often depends on where workers live.

WalletHub compared states using 12 metrics, including internet costs, cybersecurity, home size and the share of residents working remotely. Montana ranked 50th overall, placing near the bottom in both work and living environment categories.

Source: WalletHub

Chip Lupo said remote work can offer major benefits but comes with tradeoffs tied to location.

“Working from home can save people a lot of money on transportation expenses, as well as make their work environment a lot more comfortable and their hours more flexible,” Lupo said. “However, things like energy costs, internet speed, home sizes and how many people live together can greatly impact people’s savings and productivity.”

Montana’s low ranking is driven largely by high internet costs, limited broadband access in rural areas and fewer households suited for remote work. While electricity costs are relatively low, connectivity challenges remain a significant barrier.

North Dakota came in 38th across the nation, having low utility costs but facing limited remote-work participation.

South Dakota came in at 37th, balancing affordability with moderate infrastructure challenges.

Minnesota stands out as a regional leader, ranking 11th overall due to stronger infrastructure, higher remote-work adoption and better cybersecurity conditions. Meanwhile, Idaho ranked 39th and Wyoming 47th, both facing similar rural connectivity limitations as Montana.

KEYZ AM 660 logo
Get our free mobile app

Lupo said that while remote jobs can be done from anywhere, “certain states make the practice much better than others.”

Best States for Remote Work

Overall Rank StateTotal Score Work Environment Rank Living Environment Rank 
1Utah70.0791
2Delaware67.25418
3Connecticut66.6467
4Maryland65.65331
5Massachusetts65.65530
6New Jersey65.31240
7Rhode Island64.92720
8Washington63.991211
9Virginia63.241114
10North Carolina62.841512
11Minnesota62.40178
12Tennessee62.19214
13Georgia61.18283
14New Hampshire61.141035
15Pennsylvania60.83841
16Ohio60.491332
17Nevada60.212023
18Arizona60.162219
19District of Columbia59.83150
20Oregon59.382622
21Texas59.312713
22Kentucky59.172426
23Colorado59.093110
24South Carolina58.00329
25Florida57.462534
26New York57.201444
27Nebraska57.18375
28Wisconsin57.041938
29Michigan56.891643
30Illinois56.701842
31Kansas56.453617
32California56.352339
33Indiana56.063324
34Alabama55.363427
35Louisiana54.833529
36Missouri54.063828
37South Dakota53.514221
38North Dakota53.35482
39Idaho53.144316
40Maine52.882945
41Vermont50.994137
42New Mexico50.964433
43Oklahoma50.944615
44Iowa49.393946
45Mississippi49.224725
46Arkansas49.164536
47Wyoming49.15496
48Hawaii48.243049
49West Virginia45.864047
50Montana35.035048
51Alaska22.455151

10 Rock Bands Who Followed Up a Classic Album With a Total Dud

Every artist has their ups and downs. Sometimes the downs come right after a high mark.

Gallery Credit: Joe DiVita

More From KEYZ AM 660